Field Sites
STENNIS
MONTEREY
VXS-1
CHESAPEAKE BAY DET.
SHADWELL
Visitor Information
PLANNING A VISIT
DIRECTIONS
MAPS
WEATHER & TRAFFIC
Search
INFORMATION SEARCH
NRL WEB SITES
Contact NRL
PERSONNEL LOCATOR
HUMAN RESOURCES
PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE
Pipeline
Accomplishments
AWARDS & RECOGNITIONS
TIME LINE
SYSTEMS
ROCKETS
SOLAR & LUNAR STUDIES
ASTRONOMY
OCEAN & ENVIRONMENT
MATERIALS
Research
DIRECTORATES & DIVISIONS
NANOSCIENCE INSTITUTE
NRL REVIEW
FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES
NRL RESEARCH LIBRARY
FACILITIES
PROGRAM SPONSORS
Accept the Challenge
WORKING AT NRL
CAREER OPPORTUNITIES
STUDENTS & POSTDOCS
ABOUT THE AREA
About NRL
MISSION
HISTORY
COMMANDING OFFICER
DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH
RESERVE PROGRAM
INSPECTOR GENERAL
Doing Business with NRL
TECH TRANSFER
CONTRACTING DIVISION
SMALL BUSINESS
News Room
PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE
NEWS RELEASES 2009
PUBLICATIONS
POPULAR IMAGES
PUBLIC NOTICES
skip to page contentField SitesVisitor InfoSearchContact NRLPipeline
positioning image
link to home pageAccomplishmentsResearchAccept The ChallengeAbout NRLDoing Business with NRLNews Room
positioning image / NRL / Research / NRL Review / '02 / Featured Research / MIME Chemical Vapor... / Page 2
positioning image positioning image positioning image positioning image
positioning image MIME Chemical Vapor Microsensors
Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Fig2 Image
FIGURE 2
The alkanethiol stabilized cluster synthesis. After reduction of the gold ions, the competitive processes of gold particle growth and alkanethiol surface complexation determine the size of the gold nanocluster.

CLUSTER SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION

The dimensions of the core and shell of the cluster are determined by the conditions of its synthesis. Figure 2 illustrates the alkanethiol-gold cluster synthesis. The two critical reagents are the gold chloride and the alkanethiol. They are suspended in a common medium, and a reducing agent, typically NaBH4, is added. The trivalent gold is reduced to neutral gold, and the gold atoms aggregate to form a particle nucleus. The gold particle grows by the addition of gold atoms and smaller particles. As a competing process, the alkanethiol reacts with the neutral gold surface to form a sulfur-to-gold bond. The gold particle growth is terminated when its surface is encapsulated by complexation with the alkanethiol. The relative rates of gold particle growth and alkanethiol surface complexation are dependent on the concentrations of the respective gold chloride and alkanethiol reagents. Thus, the molar ratio of these reagents is a simple way to regulate the core size of the cluster. Typically, this ratio ranges from 1:3 to 8:1 and causes the corresponding core diameters to vary from 1 to 5 nm. The shell thickness of the cluster is determined by the molecular chain length of the alkanethiol selected as the reagent. The number of carbon atoms in the chain length typically ranges from 4 to 16 and generates a corresponding shell thickness ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 nm. A matrix of these clusters has been synthesized as is depicted in Table 1, where the varying core and shell relative sizes are represented pictorially by concentric circles.

Table


As a shorthand to designate individual clusters, the general abbreviation Au:Cn(X:Y) is used. X:Y is the gold chloride:alkanethiol synthesis stoichiometric ratio that correlates with core size, and n is the number of carbon atoms in the alkanethiol chain that correlates with shell thickness. The number beneath each cluster in Table 1 is the corresponding bulk DC electrical conductivity. An appreciation for the respective effects of the shell thickness and core size on the electrical conductivity can be obtained by examining the magnitude of conductivity variation down the column headed (1:1) and across the row headed C12, For the former, the variation is on the order of 107, which illustrates why such minute swelling effects on the shell have such dramatic effects on the conductivity.

Fig3 Image






FIGURE 3
Response of Au:C8(1:1) MIME sensor to five 60-s exposure-purge cycles of toluene at high and low vapor concentrations. The right axis indicates the current change in the MIME device, and the left axis is the sensor response when the current change is converted to a frequency.

MIME SENSOR RESPONSE TO VAPORS

Figure 3 shows the response of an Au:C8(1:1) MIME sensor to five 60-s exposure-purge cycles of toluene at high and low vapor concentrations. The sensor response is a measured current change (right axis) that is electronically converted to a frequency (left axis) via precision current-to-voltage and voltage/ frequency converters to allow data acquisition over a wide dynamic range using a computerized frequency counter. The toluene vapor causes a very large and rapid decrease in conductance of the sensor. Greater than 90% of the signal response occurs within 1 s of its 30-s exposure. The recovery is equally rapid and complete. The lower portion of Fig. 3 indicates that detection limits well below 1 ppm are achievable.

The MIME sensor response to toluene displays a dependece on both the core and shell dimensions of its cluster component. When the matrix of clusters depicted in Table 1 is investigated, optimum sensitivities are found for both the core diameter and the shell thickness in the midrange of the matrix. Clearly two effects operate in each case. In the latter, a thicker shell requires more sorbed vapor to achieve an amount of swelling comparable to that of a thinner shell, while a thinner shell has less of an organic character to solvate the incoming toluene. In the former case, it is not clear why a variation from 1 to 5 nm would pass through an optimum in sensor sensitivity to toluene.


Previous Page Previous Page | Next Page Next Page

NRL Home PagePrivacy Noticemail to webmaster

skip to content NRL home page